What is Creativity Anyway?

I started Creating Brains.com because I needed to read it.  I have always thought of myself as creative but through years of having little children underfoot and family-size to-do lists my creative energy shrunk.  Still I read widely and went to graduate school. Then one sunny afternoon in May my oldest daughter died suddenly and cosmic entropy ensued.  Several years later I had to admit I was no longer creative.  How could I be? I could not even remember my last novel thought.  One dark night while in the hospital expecting my last child I began this blog. I read and wrote about Creativity every day for one year.  I poured-through Applied Creativity, Biography, History, Neuroscience, Creativity Theory and insights from contemporary highly Creative people on how to live the Creative Life—from Scientists, Architects, Writers and Humanitarians.  Along the way I tinkered with practicable plans to recover for myself and my still-young children what I once thought core to human nature– the capacity to Create beyond biology.

The first book I read and claim (after reading hundreds of books on and around this topic) as my favorite, Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi’s  Creativitysupplied the original working definition for this blog. Csikszentmihalyi defines Creativity as follows:

Creativity is any act, idea, or product that changes an existing domain, or that transforms an existing domain into a new one.

And,

The definition of a creative person is:  someone whose thoughts or actions change a domain, or establish a new domain…a domain cannot be changed without explicit or implicit consent of a field responsible for it.

Not everyone will agree with Csikszentmihalyi’s definition, of course, but I love it most because it inspires as well as defines.  Others have tried to define Creativity.  Check out some of my favorite attempts below:

  • Any act, idea, or product that changes an existing domain, or that transforms an existing domain into a new one with explicit or implicit consent of the field responsible for it. (Used by M. Csikszentmihalyi)
  • Makings things from scratch. (Used by Twyla Tharp– choreographer)
  • Building on and with the works of others. (If I have seen further, it is only because I stand on the shoulders of giants.– Isaac Newton). 
  • Self-expression with no editing. (Expressing with precision all the gold sparks the soul gives off. –Joan Miro, painter)

So what is Creativity then?  Is it an effect?  Is it a cause?  And why must we (still) define it anyway?

I’ll start with my last question.  Creativity must be defined and the definition must be accepted as standard so the topic may be studied scientifically rather than philosophically.  Sixty years ago historians wondered how to improve the study of history.  History was still a discipline of philosophy at the time– inexact, subjective. It lacked scientific definition and definitiveness. This is no longer the case.  Twenty-first century historians work governed by academic definitions and parameters, more science-like than philosophical. There are down-sides to definitiveness for sure. But the study of History has progressed like never before since this transition began in the late 1970′s.  The study of Creativity would benefit from a similar transition.  The Science of Creativity is becoming more, well, scientific.  With hi-tech research tools–  fMRIs and EEGs, scientists hone in on the particulars of the Creative process.  But a general, universally accepted, definition of Creativity is still at large. Eventually we’ll want to unite all we know about Creativity from history, psychology, philosophy, neuroscience and more but for now a definition seems the next crucial step.

Am I right?  Let me know what you think.

And now back to my first question– What is Creativity after all?  Do you agree with Csikszentmihalyi or Miro?

Do you have a definition to contribute?  (If yes, write a new definition in the comments section below).

I love comments! I can’t wait to read what you think.

*Note:  I play with my children, work on a book-length project, teach college History and am about to return to grad school to complete my PhD in Early Modern European History so I do not post on Creating Brains.com very often these days.  Still, the topic of Creativity fascinates me — I will be back and more often soon (or at least sort-of-soon).

About these ads

8 Responses

  1. Has to be new or an offshoot of something established in a new way. I think it also must be to a large degree unplanned, an epiphany. For example my creativity for my cartoons, I don’t know where the ideas come from. So it is more than thinking. It is as a receptacle that is open to thoughts from some external source. Then we take it and run with it.

    • I think you’re right. A moment of new insight is unplanned. If you already know the answer to your question– it’s not Creativity.
      Thanks for commenting, Carl.

  2. Creativity is the ability to respond to or manipulate your environment in unusual, unique or innovative ways and to perceive the world from different perspectives. It makes the connection between imagination and the real world through the hands, the head and the heart. It enables people to ask questions and identify problems and respond to them in unique ways, both practical and theoretical (abstract, imaginary, conjectural, speculative). It underpins all aspects of human endeavour and is essential to human survival. Creativity is not one concept but its meaning is contextualised within the experience and expertise of an individual or group.

    • Yes! Imagination and the real world connect– I really like your wording there. Also, I think Creativity has to contain an element of philosophy (theory, etc).
      So, maybe Creativity is a system? Maybe even an emergent system?
      Thanks for commenting!

      • i like that too

  3. TY for saying so!

  4. I haven’t spent as much time as you have figuring this out, but if I can dip my toe into the pool, I would say that creative processes are so complex that defining it at all is difficult. Our minds take in so much stimuli, process it, and express something back out, some of it completely original, some of it only slight, but amazing, tweaks of what has happened before. Working with children, I have observed that creative voices cannot be defined to what set of actions or products. A child who is completely un-expressive in music or art class, will be on the field, making up variations on ways to kick a soccer ball or tricks to do on the swings. It’s this dynamic of taking stuff in, then putting stuff out there that makes up the core of creativity.

  5. Defining Creativity is very difficult– you’re right about that. I’ve been thinking of different processes that might be similar to the Creative process, like metabolism in living systems or the birth of a thought from the unconscious to insight to workable language. But still I seem to have nothing to hold– a product, a definition to work with. So my question now is, if Creativity cannot be defined (at least by me at this point in time) then how can you study it?
    I loved your comment about us taking stimuli in, processing it and expressing something back out, something original sometimes only a slight tweak. Well said.
    Thanks for commenting, Wendy!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: