Idea-Sharing is Good

Highly creative people work alone to master a domain. But, not all the time.  Some of the time they hang-out with key people and in key communities. Creators don’t hoard ideas. They know ideas fertilize in the rich soil of human exchange. Less productive creative-types often fear throwing an idea out to the wind.  But, to hold an idea within one person alone, no matter how life-changing it could be, is to bury it. Founder and CEO of Behance, Scott Belsky, says,

The process of creation is deeply consuming and lined with narcissism. We fall in love with our ideas and become both certain and protective…we become less receptive to criticism, and our ideas stagnate in isolation.

As we share our ideas with our communities, we receive feedback and support.  We may also encourage competitors, who may, at first, scare us, but who will ultimately serve to make us work harder.

For several weeks, last Spring, I rocked my premature baby sitting  in a worn-out glider-chair at UCSD Medical Center. I sang to her, chatted up the nurses and listened to doctors rounding.  In the words of one nurse,

The place is a zoo.

The facility is crowded. Nurses, attending physicians, fellows, medical students, residents, social workers, lactation specialists, respiratory therapists, ophthalmologists and volunteers work together in close quarters.  Everyone can hear when a nurse talks about the fabulous Caribbean Cruise she just returned from. But everyone can also hear a physician-attending suggesting research topics to the fellow shadowing her or the two nurses discussing  an infant respiration monitoring study they are working on.  The constant idea exchange uninhibited even the highly introverted.

Exchange, whether of ideas, recipes, or products, fuels human creativity.

Today’s Brain Candy:

Biologist Matt Ridley, spoke at TED Oxford recently about the upward mobility of human creativity, from pre-history to the future.  Enjoy below:

Curiosity: Part II

Tucked behind this month’s Architectural Digest, in my OB Doc’s waiting room,  Elizabeth Edward’s soulful blue eyes beckoned me to pick up People Magazine. “How Much More Can She Take?”  “John’s Mistress Attacks Elizabeth.“  “Explosive GQ Interview with Rielle Hunter“.  I could have read,  How to Teach Physics to Your Dog, tucked in my purse. But I just had to find out what happened to Elizabeth.  Curiosity won out.

Curiosity is often defined as a desire or drive to learn more about something.  My impulse to pick up People Magazine would fit under such a definition.  But this definition presents a problem in the study of Creativity. My desire to learn of a long-suffering political wife’s dirty laundry led nowhere. Three minutes of page flipping fully satisfied this very shallow form of curiosity. This is not curiosity that leads to Creation.

A Creator’s Curiosity has three components:

  1. Emotion:     Wonder or awe directs toward an action, be it  mental (i.e., thinking, pondering) or physical (i.e., observing, referencing, walking closer to) or both.
  2. Time:     A sense of suspension of time, but involves real time. The bigger the curiosity the more time is involved satisfying it. (Jane Godall’s mother missed her for 4 hours, before Jane came back into the house to tell of her discovery–See Curiosity: Part I post)
  3. Future: Increased dopamine activity in the hippocampus allows experience or new knowledge to be stored in long-term memory.  Curiosity stint ends with a sense of satisfaction but also a deep desire to learn more.

Creativity is not possible without this more complex Curiosity.

So, last Sunday at exactly 10:00 a.m., I asked my three older children to sit cross-legged on the carpet and introduced our first Creating Brains experiment.

We are going to have a contest.  It starts today and will end next Sunday.

They like contests, so they immediately had questions.

So, these are the rules of the contest,

I explained:

First, you will need a  blank composition notebook and a pencil.  Go find those.

Off they ran and came back quickly.  I try to keep an easy-to-reach stack of $1 composition notebooks from Target available for impromptu projects.

So, every time you hear this bell,  it means it is time to meet here, as you are right now, for our contest.  Today, the bell-ringer will be Roxy.  She’ll ring the bell several times, when I ask her, of course.

I stopped for effect.  They waited, eager but maybe a little apprehensive as well.

The contest is to see who can come up with the most questions and write them down.  The questions have to be numbered and you can only write down questions you don’t know the answers to.  It doesn’t matter if the questions are good or bad, for this contest.  We just want a lot of them and we want them to be real.

Five-year-old Roxy said,

How about we have to raise our hand if we have questions about this Question Contest?

Roxy likes rules; I’m happy she’s interested in participating.

Great.

Everyone’s hands are now raised.  Ten-year-old Frankie asked:

What are the prizes for this contest?

This wasn’t exactly the direction I wanted our discussion to take, but I expected this question would come up.

Yes.  There will be prizes next Sunday.  They will all have something to do with questions or questioning, and they’ll be good.

They relaxed.  Frankie said,

Good.  They won’t be like, just a protein bar or Popsicle then?

I shook my head.

Nope.  They’ll be good.

They trusted me.  I could tell. They all wanted to begin right away.  Right then they began to think of questions and to write them down.

Oh,  one more rule I forget to tell you.  It’s OK to borrow questions from each other.  Those will count too.

So began our Questions Contest, still running as I write.

%d bloggers like this: